5 / 21
Page 20
November 13-14, 2019 | London, UK
ORTHOPEDICS, OSTEOPOROSIS & TRAUMA
12
th
International Conference on
Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma Surgery and
Related Research
Orthopedics 2019
November 13-14, 2019
J Orthop Trauma Surg Rel Res, Volume 14
Volume: 14 | ISSN: 1897-2276
Choice of nail diameter for acute diaphyseal tibial fracture at a Major Trauma Centre:
An audit of practice
Mansoor Chaudhry
James Cook University Hospital, UK
Background
: Bone healing depends upon an ideal mechanical and biological environment. Intermedullary nailing for diaphyseal
fractures aim to provide an environment which is mechanically and biologically appropriate for bone healing. Conflict exist
among the orthopaedic community about the ideal nail thickness with some advocating using a tight fitting nail1, while others
suggest use of unreamed smaller diameter nails2 because of the adverse effect of excessive reaming on blood supply 4,5, leading
some authors to. Donegan et al. showed that nails with an intramedullary nail to canal diameter ratio of less than 0.8 or greater
than 0.99 are 4.4 times more likely not to heal than patients with a ratio of between 0.8 and 0.99.6 The aim of this study is to
determine the choice of nail diameter used for tibial shaft fractures at a Major Trauma Centre and also to evaluate various factors
that could have contributed to the choice.
Methodology
: A retrospective analysis of all tibial nails performed for acute diaphyseal fractures of tibia during one-year period
from June 2018 to May 2019 was performed. Nail to canal diameter ratio was determined using post-operative X-rays. For
comparative analysis nails were divided into two groups. Group A had nails with nail to canal diameter ratio of 0.8 or more
and Group B had the nail to canal diameter ratio of less than 0.8. Group were compared for complexity of fracture (AO class),
Open vs closed fracture, location of fracture, joint involvement, mechanism of injury (isolated vs. polytrauma), grade of surgeon
performing surger, presence of consultant during surgery, single vs. multiple surgeries at the same setting and timing of surgery.
Results
: A total number of 47 tibial nails for acute diaphyseal fractures were performed during the study period. 8 nails were
excluded due to non-availability of post-operative X-rays. Out of the 41 nails assessed, 30 (73%) had the nail diameter to canal
ratio of 0.8 or more and 11 (27%) had the nail diameter to canal ratio of less than 0.8. The results of other variables evaluated
are tabulated.
Conclusion
: Over a quarter of tibial nails performed at a major trauma centre for acute diaphyseal tibial fractures had a nail to
canal diameter ratio of less than 0.8 exposing them to significant risk of non-union. Apart from the fractures being open, none of
the other variables was seen to negatively influence the surgeon’s choice.
Biography
Mansoor Chaudhry is a Senior Trauma Fellow at James Cook University Hospital. He has worked through various orthopaedic roles
in UK and abroad. His major interest lies in Trauma and has an extensive experience of orthopaedic trauma surgery that includes
management of mass casualty situations.
talk2mansoor@yahoo.com