Previous Page  4 / 10 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 10 Next Page
Page Background

Page 21

Volume 13

Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma Surgery & Related Research

Arthroplasty 2018

September 24-25, 2018

Arthroplasty

September 24-25, 2018 London, UK

11

th

International Conference on

Normative data of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score, joint replacement in a healthy

United States population

Avais Raja, Asher Jenkins, Megan Reams and Patrick K Horst

TRIA Research Institute, USA

Background:

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) play a vital role in the care we provide to our patients. To help

understand the application of PROM in arthroplasty, normative and benchmark data to serve as a comparison to patients pre- and

post-surgery would be extremely valuable. We collected normative data of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

(HOOS), joint replacement (JR) on a healthy population, greater than 17 years of age, in the United States devoid of hip injury and/

or surgery.

Methods:

This was a cross-sectional study, where hard copy surveys were administered to 1140 patients, being seen for an orthopedic

issue unrelated to their hip and non-patient visitors in July 2018 at an outpatient orthopedic clinic in a suburban metropolitan city.

Participants were eligible if they self-reported a medical history negative for hip replacement, current hip pain/disability or hip

procedure (surgery or injection) within the past year. Mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile ranges on the HOOS, JR

interval scores were calculated by sex, age decade, BMI, reason for visit, history of orthopedic procedure and past medical history.

Results:

Four hundred twenty-five (425) men and 575 women were included in the final study cohort. Women aged between 70 to

79 years reported the lowest mean interval score (mean=88.8). Overall women scored lower as well (93.3 vs. 95.7, p=0.001). There

was not a statistical difference between the interval scores by tobacco consumption (93.5 vs. 94.4, p=0.49) and between patient’s vs.

non-patient visitors (94.2 vs. 94.5, p=0.672). Lower scores were observed in participants with a past non-hip orthopedic procedure

(92.6 vs. 94.9, p=0.016), past medical history of a chronic illness (92.5 vs. 95.9, p=<0.001) and participants classified as obese

(BMI>30) (91.7 vs. 95.2, p<0.001). On regression analysis, there was a decrease of 0.3 and 0.1 in the interval score for each unit of

BMI and age by year, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

This study provides normative reference values for the HOOS, JR in a United States population from a suburban

metropolitan city greater than 17 years of age. These scores can facilitate physician-patient shared decision making to help patients

understand expectations post-hip arthroplasty in respect to PROM.

Biography

Avais Raja is a Post-Doctoral Research Fellow currently working at TRIA Research Institute. He is currently in transition to Orthopedic Surgery Residency.

avais.raja@tria.com

Avais Raja et al., J Arthroplasty 2018, Volume 13